
UT Martin
22-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.4%UT Martin
91.6%McNeese
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -14.7
PROJECTED TOTAL136.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -1090

McNeese
27-6MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 61
Projected Total136.7
Projected ScoreMcNeese 76
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index66.7
103.8Offensive Efficiency117.4
94.0Defensive Efficiency98.3
9.8Net Efficiency19.1
-4.8Strength of Schedule-1.6
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency15.5
67.2Tempo66.0
49.5%Effective FG%52.2%
21.4%Turnover Rate13.9%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %37.1%
37.5%Free Throw Rate37.7%
6.6Average Margin12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (66.7–49.8), offensive efficiency (117.4–103.8), net efficiency (19.1–9.8), strength of schedule (-1.6–-4.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–98.3), offensive rebounding (37.9–37.1).