
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.6%Pennsylvania
31.4%La Salle
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL146.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -218

La Salle
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 75
Projected Total146.6
Projected ScoreLa Salle 71
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index41.3
108.6Offensive Efficiency100.8
106.4Defensive Efficiency111.3
2.2Net Efficiency-10.5
1.9Strength of Schedule4.6
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.9
69.9Tempo66.5
50.9%Effective FG%46.2%
15.4%Turnover Rate18.2%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
36.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%
1.5Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–41.3), offensive efficiency (108.6–100.8), defensive efficiency (106.4–111.3), net efficiency (2.2–-10.5).
La Salle COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–1.9), offensive rebounding (33.8–31.1), free throw rate (38.3–36.3).