Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.0%Alabama A&M

97.0%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -22.9

PROJECTED TOTAL155.1

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -3233

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 66

Projected Total155.1

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricVanderbilt

42.3MMH Power Index68.9

105.9Offensive Efficiency120.9

106.6Defensive Efficiency105.7

-0.7Net Efficiency15.2

-6.8Strength of Schedule7.4

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

68.0Tempo70.9

49.7%Effective FG%55.3%

16.8%Turnover Rate13.5%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

45.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-0.5Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (120.9–105.9), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.6), net efficiency (15.2–-0.7).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.3–2.7), free throw rate (45.7–39.3).

Final

Alabama A&M

59—78

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 19 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATVanderbilt

18-63FG23-53

29.0%FG%43.0%

4-213PT8-25

19.0%3PT%32.0%

19-20FT24-34

95.0%FT%71.0%

41Rebounds43

12Offensive Rebounds9

8Assists16

12Turnovers10

4Steals5

—Blocks2

26Fouls15

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Omari Peek	Guard	25	5-12	3-4	0-0	5	1	0	13
EJ Williams	Center	19	2-6	0-1	8-8	2	1	0	12
Dailin Smith	G	20	4-10	0-1	3-3	3	0	0	11
AC Bryant	G	15	2-6	1-3	2-2	2	0	1	7
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	12	0-4	0-3	4-4	4	0	0	4
Chad Moodie	F	16	1-5	0-0	1-1	4	0	0	3
Caleb Blackwell	G	19	1-5	0-2	0-0	1	5	1	2
Jayland Randall	G	14	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	2
Eric Lee	Guard	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2
Austin Harvell	Forward	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2
Darius Osborne	Forward	16	0-2	0-1	1-2	2	0	1	1
London Riley	Guard	14	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0
William Tavares	Center	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	6	0	0	0
Dylan Mclean	Guard	7	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	1	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyrin Lawrence	Guard	31	5-9	1-4	8-10	4	2	1	0	19
Ven-Allen Lubin	F	28	4-9	2-5	4-5	10	0	0	1	14
Ezra Manjon	Guard	27	4-8	1-3	3-4	3	7	2	0	12
Evan Taylor	Guard	23	2-8	2-5	4-4	2	1	0	0	10
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	20	3-8	1-4	3-5	8	3	1	0	10
Carter Lang	F	23	2-3	0-0	1-4	8	0	1	0	5
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	12	1-1	1-1	1-1	1	0	0	0	4
Paul Lewis	G	13	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
JaQualon Roberts	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	1	2
Malik Presley	G	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4

82.6Offensive Efficiency109.2

109.2Defensive Efficiency82.6

-26.6Net Efficiency26.6

31.7%Effective FG%50.9%

40.7%True Shooting %56.4%

16.6%Turnover Rate14.3%

31.7%Free Throw Rate64.2%

33.3%3-Point Rate47.2%

0.67Assist / Turnover1.60

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.