UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
67.7%UT Rio Grande Valley
32.3%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -210
Tarleton State logo

Tarleton State

14-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76
Projected Total148.0
Projected ScoreTarleton State 72

Team Comparison

55.8MMH Power Index44.6
112.6Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.1Defensive Efficiency101.6
9.5Net Efficiency1.6
-1.9Strength of Schedule-2.3
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
67.4Tempo72.2
55.7%Effective FG%49.0%
17.9%Turnover Rate19.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
29.6%Free Throw Rate42.8%
6.4Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–103.2), net efficiency (9.5–1.6), strength of schedule (-1.9–-2.3).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.6–103.1), offensive rebounding (31.8–29.2), free throw rate (42.8–29.6).
Final
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
75—77
Tarleton State logo
Tarleton State
Tarleton State by 2 • 72.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATTarleton State
25-55FG28-62
45.0%FG%45.0%
6-143PT3-13
43.0%3PT%23.0%
19-26FT18-23
73.0%FT%78.0%
33Rebounds37
12Offensive Rebounds14
10Assists13
17Turnovers14
10Steals11
1Blocks9
21Fouls23

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hasan Abdul HakimG265-92-311-1471110023
Daylen WilliamsForward368-100-00-132000016
Elijah ElliottG335-132-60-054300012
Ahren FreemanForward311-60-07-85000009
Sherman BrashearGuard252-52-41-22040007
J.J. HowardGuard222-80-10-00110004
Isaiah BarganierF141-20-00-04000002
CJ BookerPG131-20-00-12210002
Tarleton State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
KiAndre GaddyForward356-100-06-9102270018
Jakorie SmithForward266-121-44-432300017
Lue WilliamsGuard304-111-32-250120011
Emmanuel InnocentiG295-101-20-020100011
Devon BarnesG313-110-34-655000010
Bubu BenjaminG202-30-02-23220006
Miles LewisGuard121-30-00-03100002
Izzy MilesG31-10-00-01100002
Adam MoussaGuard70-10-10-00020000
Traivar JacksonF40-00-00-02000000
Dario DomingosF30-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.7Possessions72.7
103.2Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.9Defensive Efficiency103.2
-2.8Net Efficiency2.8
50.9%Effective FG%47.6%
55.7%True Shooting %52.8%
23.5%Turnover Rate19.2%
47.3%Free Throw Rate37.1%
25.5%3-Point Rate21.0%
0.59Assist / Turnover0.93
Game Summary
Tarleton State won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 72.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.