
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
67.7%UT Rio Grande Valley
32.3%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -210

Tarleton State
14-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76
Projected Total148.0
Projected ScoreTarleton State 72
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index44.6
112.6Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.1Defensive Efficiency101.6
9.5Net Efficiency1.6
-1.9Strength of Schedule-2.3
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
67.4Tempo72.2
55.7%Effective FG%49.0%
17.9%Turnover Rate19.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
29.6%Free Throw Rate42.8%
6.4Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–103.2), net efficiency (9.5–1.6), strength of schedule (-1.9–-2.3).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.6–103.1), offensive rebounding (31.8–29.2), free throw rate (42.8–29.6).