
UMass Lowell
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.6%UMass Lowell
83.4%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -502

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMass Lowell 66
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreMerrimack 77
Team Comparison
43.8MMH Power Index53.7
107.9Offensive Efficiency106.4
109.9Defensive Efficiency103.2
-2.0Net Efficiency3.2
-4.6Strength of Schedule0.7
1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
69.4Tempo64.4
51.0%Effective FG%49.3%
17.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
35.1%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
37.9%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-1.4Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–43.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–109.9), net efficiency (3.2–-2.0), strength of schedule (0.7–-4.6).
UMass Lowell COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.9–106.4), shooting efficiency (51.0–49.3), offensive rebounding (35.1–24.7).