
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.5%Columbia
18.5%New Hampshire
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -8.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.1
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -441

New Hampshire
9-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 78
Projected Total147.1
Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 69
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index34
112.4Offensive Efficiency99.6
105.2Defensive Efficiency107.5
7.2Net Efficiency-7.9
-1.7Strength of Schedule-3.4
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
68.2Tempo69.4
54.4%Effective FG%47.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate16.1%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
28.8%Free Throw Rate29.4%
5.0Average Margin-5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–34.0), offensive efficiency (112.4–99.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.5), net efficiency (7.2–-7.9).
New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHball security (16.1–19.1), free throw rate (29.4–28.8).