
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Tulane
76.5%Fordham
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL141.4
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -326

Fordham
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 66
Projected Total141.4
Projected ScoreFordham 76
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index50.3
105.3Offensive Efficiency105.9
109.9Defensive Efficiency99.3
-4.6Net Efficiency6.6
2.7Strength of Schedule-2.4
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9
68.7Tempo65.9
49.6%Effective FG%50.0%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
44.8%Free Throw Rate26.9%
-3.2Average Margin4.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fordham HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–44.3), offensive efficiency (105.9–105.3), defensive efficiency (99.3–109.9), net efficiency (6.6–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.4), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (44.8–26.9).