Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

63.1%Clemson

36.9%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -3.3

PROJECTED TOTAL138.5

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -171

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 71

Projected Total138.5

Projected ScorePittsburgh 68

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricPittsburgh

59.9MMH Power Index50.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency108.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency110.4

11.2Net Efficiency-2.0

4.6Strength of Schedule5.5

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

63.6Tempo65.0

53.0%Effective FG%51.4%

14.0%Turnover Rate17.3%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

38.1%Free Throw Rate31.2%

7.2Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–110.4), net efficiency (11.2–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), offensive rebounding (33.1–27.0).

Final

Clemson

79—70

Pittsburgh

Clemson by 9 • 65.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATPittsburgh

28-60FG25-58

47.0%FG%43.0%

11-303PT8-23

37.0%3PT%35.0%

12-15FT12-22

80.0%FT%55.0%

40Rebounds33

11Offensive Rebounds10

15Assists13

9Turnovers7

5Steals6

1Blocks4

19Fouls16

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joseph Girard III	Guard	34	7-10	6-9	5-5	1	2	1	0	25
PJ Hall	Center	34	9-14	3-6	1-3	11	3	3	1	22
Chauncey Wiggins	F	31	4-11	2-8	2-2	3	1	0	0	12
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	26	3-7	0-0	2-2	17	0	1	0	8
Chase Hunter	Guard	28	1-9	0-5	2-2	1	5	0	0	4
RJ Godfrey	F	14	2-3	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	0	4
Joshua Beadle	G	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Bas Leyte	Forward	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Dillon Hunter	G	17	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	2	0	0	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Blake Hinson	Forward	34	9-16	6-10	3-6	6	2	0	0	27
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	34	6-11	1-3	4-4	2	0	0	1	17
Bub Carrington	Guard	37	5-16	1-5	2-4	4	6	2	0	13
Zack Austin	Forward	34	2-4	0-0	3-4	7	0	2	2	7
Federiko Federiko	F	29	3-4	0-0	0-4	3	2	1	0	6
Will Jeffress	F	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	1	0
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	11	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Jaland Lowe	G	9	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3

121.0Offensive Efficiency107.2

107.2Defensive Efficiency121.0

13.8Net Efficiency-13.8

55.8%Effective FG%50.0%

58.8%True Shooting %51.1%

13.8%Turnover Rate10.7%

25.0%Free Throw Rate37.9%

50.0%3-Point Rate39.7%

1.67Assist / Turnover1.86

Game Summary

Clemson won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.