
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
45.6%Drexel
54.4%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPrinceton -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL136.9
MODEL MONEYLINEPrinceton -119

Princeton
9-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 68
Projected Total136.9
Projected ScorePrinceton 69
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index43.5
103.6Offensive Efficiency105.1
102.4Defensive Efficiency110.3
1.2Net Efficiency-5.2
-0.4Strength of Schedule1.7
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
65.7Tempo65.2
51.3%Effective FG%50.3%
19.1%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
32.3%Free Throw Rate35.0%
0.8Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Drexel HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDrexel holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.5–43.5), defensive efficiency (102.4–110.3), net efficiency (1.2–-5.2), recent form (-4.7–-8.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.1–103.6), strength of schedule (1.7–-0.4), ball security (16.9–19.1).