Weber State

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.2%Weber State

81.8%Utah Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -11.5

PROJECTED TOTAL156.5

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -449

Utah Valley

25-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWeber State 73

Projected Total156.5

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 84

Team Comparison

Weber StateMetricUtah Valley

50.2MMH Power Index59.1

113.6Offensive Efficiency113.4

108.2Defensive Efficiency97.3

5.4Net Efficiency16.1

-3.4Strength of Schedule-3.3

-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

71.5Tempo70.6

52.6%Effective FG%56.0%

15.5%Turnover Rate19.9%

32.6%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

38.3%Free Throw Rate37.3%

3.9Average Margin11.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–50.2), defensive efficiency (97.3–108.2), net efficiency (16.1–5.4), strength of schedule (-3.3–-3.4).

Weber State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (113.6–113.4), ball security (15.5–19.9), free throw rate (38.3–37.3).

Final

Weber State

54—70

Utah Valley

Utah Valley by 16 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Weber StateTEAM STATUtah Valley

21-59FG28-52

36.0%FG%54.0%

6-203PT8-15

30.0%3PT%53.0%

6-18FT6-8

33.0%FT%75.0%

37Rebounds33

13Offensive Rebounds1

9Assists16

11Turnovers11

6Steals7

2Blocks8

10Fouls16

Player Box Score

Weber State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dillon Jones	Forward	36	5-16	1-5	2-6	7	3	3	0	13
Steven Verplancken	Guard	34	4-10	3-6	0-0	2	1	2	0	11
Blaise Threatt	Guard	21	4-7	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	9
KJ Cunningham	Guard	29	3-10	1-3	0-0	3	3	0	0	7
Dyson Koehler	Forward	21	1-6	0-3	4-10	4	0	0	0	6
Alex Tew	Center	23	2-4	0-0	0-2	8	2	1	1	4
Viljami Vartiainen	G	16	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Arnaud Revaz	Forward	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Handje Tamba	C	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Marko Šarenac	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Louie Jordan	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	Forward	36	7-15	3-6	2-2	4	2	0	0	19
Nate Tshimanga	Forward	16	6-9	0-0	2-3	7	1	2	0	14
Jaden McClanahan	Guard	26	3-4	2-2	2-2	3	5	1	0	10
Tanner Toolson	G	33	3-8	2-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	8
K'mani Doughty	Guard	29	3-6	1-3	0-1	4	2	2	2	7
Osiris Grady	F	15	3-3	0-0	0-0	6	2	1	0	6
Trevin Dorius	Center	22	1-5	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	4	2
Trevan Leonhardt	G	13	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	3	1	0	2
Ethan Potter	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2	2

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

82.2Offensive Efficiency106.5

106.5Defensive Efficiency82.2

-24.4Net Efficiency24.4

40.7%Effective FG%61.5%

40.0%True Shooting %62.7%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.7%

30.5%Free Throw Rate15.4%

33.9%3-Point Rate28.8%

0.82Assist / Turnover1.45

Game Summary

Utah Valley won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.