
Loyola Chicago
9-24GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.4%Loyola Chicago
96.6%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -23.7
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -2841

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Chicago 64
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreTulsa 88
Team Comparison
39.3MMH Power Index64.8
101.0Offensive Efficiency121.1
114.6Defensive Efficiency104.8
-13.6Net Efficiency16.3
4.3Strength of Schedule0.0
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
66.1Tempo70.2
50.1%Effective FG%55.4%
19.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
35.7%Free Throw Rate42.4%
-9.0Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–39.3), offensive efficiency (121.1–101.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–114.6), net efficiency (16.3–-13.6).
Loyola Chicago COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.3–0.0).