Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%Florida A&M

78.8%Presbyterian

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPresbyterian -9.5

PROJECTED TOTAL145.1

MODEL MONEYLINEPresbyterian -372

Presbyterian

15-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68

Projected Total145.1

Projected ScorePresbyterian 77

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricPresbyterian

39.4MMH Power Index46.6

98.7Offensive Efficiency107.2

105.6Defensive Efficiency106.9

-6.9Net Efficiency0.3

-3.2Strength of Schedule-1.6

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.9

70.6Tempo67.5

49.2%Effective FG%52.3%

21.6%Turnover Rate19.3%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %33.7%

38.0%Free Throw Rate41.1%

-4.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Presbyterian HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPresbyterian holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.6–39.4), offensive efficiency (107.2–98.7), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9), strength of schedule (-1.6–-3.2).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–106.9), recent form (4.5–-2.9).

Final

Florida A&M

65—60

Presbyterian

Florida A&M by 5 • 68.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATPresbyterian

23-47FG19-47

49.0%FG%40.0%

4-123PT5-21

33.0%3PT%24.0%

15-18FT17-23

83.0%FT%74.0%

26Rebounds27

3Offensive Rebounds5

12Assists11

15Turnovers17

9Steals8

5Blocks—

21Fouls16

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Love Bettis	G	32	6-12	2-3	8-9	2	2	1	0	22
Shannon Grant	Center	24	6-9	0-0	1-1	6	0	0	2	13
Keith Lamar	F	33	5-10	0-3	0-0	7	2	2	1	10
Hantz Louis-Jeune	G	21	4-5	2-2	0-0	2	1	3	0	10
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	16	2-3	0-0	3-4	3	0	0	2	7
K'Jei Parker	G	31	0-4	0-3	2-2	3	2	2	0	2
Roderick Coffee III	F	25	0-3	0-0	1-2	0	5	0	0	1
Jordan Chatman	G	16	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Miles Hall	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Presbyterian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jamahri Harvey	Not Available	26	2-7	1-6	6-8	3	3	0	11
Kory Mincy	G	22	3-6	0-3	5-6	2	3	1	11
Kobe Stewart	Not Available	28	4-7	2-5	0-1	6	1	1	10
Jonah Pierce	F	14	4-5	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	8
Crosby James	Guard	14	2-3	1-1	3-3	1	0	2	8
Kaleb Scott	Not Available	26	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	4
Marquis Barnett	Not Available	26	1-5	0-1	1-2	4	1	1	3
Samage Teel	Guard	18	1-6	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	3
Trevon Reddish-Rhone	Not Available	17	0-2	0-0	2-2	1	1	1	2
Carl Parrish	G	9	0-4	0-2	0-0	1	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.8Possessions68.8

94.5Offensive Efficiency87.2

87.2Defensive Efficiency94.5

7.3Net Efficiency-7.3

53.2%Effective FG%45.7%

58.5%True Shooting %51.8%

22.2%Turnover Rate24.3%

38.3%Free Throw Rate48.9%

25.5%3-Point Rate44.7%

0.80Assist / Turnover0.65

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.