
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.2%Duquesne
65.8%Marshall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarshall -4.7
PROJECTED TOTAL159.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMarshall -192

Marshall
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 78
Projected Total159.8
Projected ScoreMarshall 82
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index52
110.6Offensive Efficiency114.7
106.2Defensive Efficiency110.3
4.4Net Efficiency4.4
0.6Strength of Schedule0.9
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.9
70.8Tempo70.7
53.4%Effective FG%55.2%
17.7%Turnover Rate16.5%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
38.2%Free Throw Rate29.7%
3.1Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Marshall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarshall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.0–50.7), offensive efficiency (114.7–110.6), net efficiency (4.4–4.4), strength of schedule (0.9–0.6).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.2–110.3), free throw rate (38.2–29.7).