Canisius

10-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.6%Canisius

91.4%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -15.1

PROJECTED TOTAL136.8

MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -1063

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCanisius 61

Projected Total136.8

Projected ScorePittsburgh 76

Team Comparison

CanisiusMetricPittsburgh

33.9MMH Power Index50.5

97.1Offensive Efficiency108.4

108.8Defensive Efficiency110.4

-11.7Net Efficiency-2.0

-1.8Strength of Schedule5.5

-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

64.8Tempo65.0

46.8%Effective FG%51.4%

19.6%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.1%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

32.4%Free Throw Rate31.2%

-7.5Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Pittsburgh HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPittsburgh holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.5–33.9), offensive efficiency (108.4–97.1), net efficiency (-2.0–-11.7), strength of schedule (5.5–-1.8).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.8–110.4), free throw rate (32.4–31.2).

Final

Canisius

71—82

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh by 11 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CanisiusTEAM STATPittsburgh

26-49FG31-58

53.0%FG%53.0%

9-243PT12-24

38.0%3PT%50.0%

10-10FT8-12

100.0%FT%67.0%

25Rebounds25

3Offensive Rebounds6

14Assists16

15Turnovers8

3Steals8

1Blocks1

15Fouls8

Player Box Score

Canisius

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Siem Uijtendaal	Guard	39	6-8	1-2	5-5	6	5	0	0	18
Tre Dinkins	G	38	5-12	3-8	2-2	1	3	1	0	15
Frank Mitchell	F	28	6-8	0-0	0-0	9	1	2	0	12
Bryce Okpoh	Forward	24	3-6	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	7
TJ Gadsden	Guard	35	1-6	1-5	3-3	5	3	0	0	6
TJ Porter	Forward	11	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Youri Fritz	F	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	4
Cameron Palesse	G	9	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	3

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Blake Hinson	Forward	36	8-13	3-4	7-7	5	0	0	0	26
Bub Carrington	Guard	32	7-16	2-9	0-0	4	5	1	1	16
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	36	5-9	3-5	0-1	5	5	1	0	13
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	21	3-4	1-1	0-2	2	1	0	0	7
Will Jeffress	F	22	2-6	2-2	0-0	3	0	1	0	6
Federiko Federiko	F	19	2-2	0-0	1-2	1	1	0	0	5
Jorge Diaz Graham	F	14	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	2	3	0	5
Jaland Lowe	G	14	2-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	0	4
Zack Austin	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

107.9Offensive Efficiency124.6

124.6Defensive Efficiency107.9

-16.7Net Efficiency16.7

62.2%Effective FG%63.8%

66.0%True Shooting %64.4%

22.8%Turnover Rate12.2%

20.4%Free Throw Rate20.7%

49.0%3-Point Rate41.4%

0.93Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Pittsburgh won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.