Cal Poly

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.5%Cal Poly

71.5%Weber State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWeber State -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL168.1

MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -251

Weber State

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCal Poly 80

Projected Total168.1

Projected ScoreWeber State 88

Team Comparison

Cal PolyMetricWeber State

46.5MMH Power Index50.2

107.2Offensive Efficiency113.6

111.0Defensive Efficiency108.2

-3.8Net Efficiency5.4

1.7Strength of Schedule-3.4

2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.8

76.6Tempo71.5

52.2%Effective FG%52.6%

19.8%Turnover Rate15.5%

29.9%Offensive Rebound %32.6%

35.8%Free Throw Rate38.3%

-2.9Average Margin3.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Weber State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–46.5), offensive efficiency (113.6–107.2), defensive efficiency (108.2–111.0), net efficiency (5.4–-3.8).

Cal Poly COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-3.4), recent form (2.4–-1.8).

Final

Cal Poly

50—78

Weber State

Weber State by 28 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Cal PolyTEAM STATWeber State

18-41FG26-61

44.0%FG%43.0%

5-123PT10-26

42.0%3PT%38.0%

9-11FT16-19

82.0%FT%84.0%

29Rebounds32

2Offensive Rebounds10

6Assists15

22Turnovers7

5Steals12

2Blocks1

17Fouls13

Player Box Score

Cal Poly

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kobe Sanders	Guard	33	5-11	1-4	5-5	4	2	2	0	16
Quentin Jones	G	37	4-8	1-1	0-0	7	0	2	1	9
Tuukka Jaakkola	Forward	26	3-4	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	0	8
Jarred Hyder	Guard	22	1-2	1-2	2-2	2	1	0	0	5
Paul Bizimana	Forward	19	2-6	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Justin Page	G	15	1-4	1-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Cole Haller	Forward	7	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Joel Armotrading	C	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Aaron Price Jr.	PF	14	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Isaac Spears	Guard	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Hayden Jory	Guard	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0

Weber State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dyson Koehler	Forward	31	3-8	3-6	8-8	2	1	5	0	17
Dillon Jones	Forward	37	6-11	1-3	2-2	10	9	2	0	15
Steven Verplancken	Guard	30	5-12	5-9	0-0	4	1	2	0	15
Blaise Threatt	Guard	18	3-7	0-1	2-2	1	1	1	0	8
Alex Tew	Center	14	3-5	0-0	2-3	4	3	0	0	8
Viljami Vartiainen	G	18	3-6	1-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	7
Arnaud Revaz	Forward	13	1-2	0-0	2-2	1	0	1	1	4
Marko Šarenac	F	8	2-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
KJ Cunningham	Guard	15	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Handje Tamba	C	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Louie Jordan	F	4	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chris Dockery	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Cole Lake	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

75.1Offensive Efficiency117.1

117.1Defensive Efficiency75.1

-42.0Net Efficiency42.0

50.0%Effective FG%50.8%

54.1%True Shooting %55.7%

33.2%Turnover Rate10.4%

26.8%Free Throw Rate31.1%

29.3%3-Point Rate42.6%

0.27Assist / Turnover2.14

Game Summary

Weber State won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.