
Loyola Marymount
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.3%Loyola Marymount
69.7%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -230

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 75
Projected Total154.3
Projected ScoreUNLV 80
Team Comparison
49.9MMH Power Index52.8
107.0Offensive Efficiency111.0
103.8Defensive Efficiency109.6
3.2Net Efficiency1.4
0.5Strength of Schedule2.7
-1.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
69.4Tempo71.4
52.8%Effective FG%53.7%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.2%
27.3%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
32.1%Free Throw Rate41.6%
2.2Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–49.9), offensive efficiency (111.0–107.0), strength of schedule (2.7–0.5), recent form (1.1–-1.2).
Loyola Marymount COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.8–109.6), net efficiency (3.2–1.4), average scoring margin (2.2–1.0).