
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.2%Columbia
26.8%Fairleigh Dickinson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -273

Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 74
Projected Total143.0
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 69
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index38.3
112.4Offensive Efficiency103.8
105.2Defensive Efficiency108.4
7.2Net Efficiency-4.6
-1.7Strength of Schedule-5.8
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
68.2Tempo64.7
54.4%Effective FG%48.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.2%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
28.8%Free Throw Rate33.1%
5.0Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–38.3), offensive efficiency (112.4–103.8), defensive efficiency (105.2–108.4), net efficiency (7.2–-4.6).
Fairleigh Dickinson COUNTERS WITHball security (18.2–19.1), free throw rate (33.1–28.8).