Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.1%Stonehill

51.9%New Hampshire

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNew Hampshire -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL138.7

MODEL MONEYLINENew Hampshire -108

New Hampshire

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 69

Projected Total138.7

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 70

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricNew Hampshire

37.9MMH Power Index34

97.5Offensive Efficiency99.6

100.7Defensive Efficiency107.5

-3.2Net Efficiency-7.9

-5.4Strength of Schedule-3.4

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

68.1Tempo69.4

48.0%Effective FG%47.6%

19.1%Turnover Rate16.1%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

29.2%Free Throw Rate29.4%

-2.2Average Margin-5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–34.0), defensive efficiency (100.7–107.5), net efficiency (-3.2–-7.9), recent form (-3.4–-17.6).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (99.6–97.5), strength of schedule (-3.4–-5.4), ball security (16.1–19.1).

Final

Stonehill

62—75

New Hampshire

New Hampshire by 13 • 74.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATNew Hampshire

22-64FG25-63

34.0%FG%40.0%

10-333PT11-29

30.0%3PT%38.0%

8-11FT14-19

73.0%FT%74.0%

42Rebounds43

10Offensive Rebounds8

11Assists17

15Turnovers11

7Steals11

5Blocks2

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Zegarowski	Forward	37	6-12	3-7	3-4	3	0	1	1	18
Chas Stinson	G	27	4-12	1-6	0-0	11	4	0	2	9
Se'yphon Triplett	Guard	22	3-10	0-1	2-3	4	1	1	0	8
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	21	3-8	1-4	0-0	4	1	1	0	7
Tony Felder	Guard	29	2-11	2-9	0-0	2	3	1	0	6
Todd Brogna	F	19	1-4	1-3	3-4	5	0	0	1	6
Louie Semona III	F	16	2-3	2-2	0-0	2	2	3	0	6
Neal Marquardt	Forward	9	1-3	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	2
Nathan McGill	Guard	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Thatcher Stone	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Clarence Daniels	Forward	37	7-19	1-6	5-5	12	0	2	0	20
Ahmad Robinson	G	24	4-12	3-4	2-4	4	7	0	0	13
Christian Moore	Guard	21	5-9	2-6	0-0	1	2	2	0	12
Dior Davis	Guard	12	3-3	2-2	1-1	3	0	2	0	9
Trey Woodyard	F	24	1-5	1-4	2-2	4	3	2	0	5
Naim Miller	Guard	21	2-7	1-4	0-0	5	3	1	0	5
Jaxson Baker	Forward	26	1-4	0-1	2-2	4	0	1	0	4
Rex Sunderland	G	15	1-2	1-2	1-3	1	1	1	0	4
Paul Gakmar	Forward	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	2
Davide Poser	F	5	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	1	1

Advanced Game Stats

74.6Possessions74.6

83.1Offensive Efficiency100.5

100.5Defensive Efficiency83.1

-17.4Net Efficiency17.4

42.2%Effective FG%48.4%

44.8%True Shooting %52.1%

20.2%Turnover Rate14.7%

17.2%Free Throw Rate30.2%

51.6%3-Point Rate46.0%

0.73Assist / Turnover1.55

Game Summary

New Hampshire won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 74.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.