Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.9%Alabama A&M

86.1%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -11.7

PROJECTED TOTAL151.1

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -619

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 70

Projected Total151.1

Projected ScoreSamford 81

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricSamford

42.3MMH Power Index54.1

105.9Offensive Efficiency113.5

106.6Defensive Efficiency108.3

-0.7Net Efficiency5.2

-6.8Strength of Schedule-2.9

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.0Tempo69.5

49.7%Effective FG%54.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate13.3%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

45.7%Free Throw Rate42.5%

-0.5Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–42.3), offensive efficiency (113.5–105.9), net efficiency (5.2–-0.7), strength of schedule (-2.9–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–108.3), offensive rebounding (28.0–25.3), free throw rate (45.7–42.5).

Final

Alabama A&M

91—118

Samford

Samford by 27 • 96.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATSamford

31-61FG36-66

51.0%FG%55.0%

2-73PT18-30

29.0%3PT%60.0%

27-39FT28-33

69.0%FT%85.0%

34Rebounds34

12Offensive Rebounds11

9Assists25

28Turnovers26

18Steals19

3Blocks5

25Fouls28

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dailin Smith	G	29	5-8	0-0	8-12	4	1	5	1	18
Jayland Randall	G	27	6-10	0-1	4-5	6	1	2	0	16
AC Bryant	G	19	3-8	0-0	6-6	5	0	3	0	12
Caleb Blackwell	G	25	3-4	1-2	2-2	1	3	4	0	9
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	24	4-5	0-1	1-1	3	1	1	2	9
Dylan Mclean	Guard	10	2-7	1-1	2-3	0	1	0	0	7
Omari Peek	Guard	16	2-6	0-1	2-4	5	1	0	0	6
EJ Williams	Center	13	2-3	0-0	0-2	3	0	0	0	4
William Tavares	Center	5	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
London Riley	Guard	9	1-2	0-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	3
Eric Lee	Guard	9	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	1	2	0	2
Chad Moodie	F	10	0-3	0-0	1-2	1	0	1	0	1
Darius Osborne	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ Staton-McCray	G	20	5-12	2-6	6-6	6	3	3	1	18
Jermaine Marshall	Forward	20	5-6	3-3	3-3	5	2	3	0	16
Dallas Graziani	Guard	19	3-3	3-3	2-2	0	4	1	0	11
Josh Holloway	G	17	4-8	1-2	2-2	3	5	2	0	11
Lukas Walls	G	16	3-4	2-3	3-3	4	0	1	1	11
Nathan Johnson	Forward	14	4-6	2-2	0-2	1	0	0	0	10
Chandler Leopard	Guard	14	3-5	3-5	1-2	2	1	1	0	10
Riley Allenspach	F	15	3-4	0-0	3-5	3	0	0	0	9
Rylan Jones	Guard	18	1-3	1-3	4-4	0	5	1	0	7
Garrett Hicks	Guard	18	1-6	0-2	4-4	1	5	4	0	6
Achor Achor	F	17	2-6	1-1	0-0	3	0	3	2	5
Zach Loveday	Center	8	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	4
Joshua Hughes	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Grayson Walters	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Thomas Kizer	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Owen LaRocca	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

96.1Possessions96.1

94.7Offensive Efficiency122.8

122.8Defensive Efficiency94.7

-28.1Net Efficiency28.1

52.5%Effective FG%68.2%

57.2%True Shooting %72.2%

29.3%Turnover Rate26.9%

63.9%Free Throw Rate50.0%

11.5%3-Point Rate45.5%

0.32Assist / Turnover0.96

Game Summary

Samford won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 96.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.