UNC Asheville

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.1%UNC Asheville

91.9%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAuburn -14.8

PROJECTED TOTAL157.0

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -1135

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUNC Asheville 71

Projected Total157.0

Projected ScoreAuburn 86

Team Comparison

UNC AshevilleMetricAuburn

47.2MMH Power Index64.4

107.5Offensive Efficiency118.8

106.8Defensive Efficiency113.0

0.7Net Efficiency5.8

-0.5Strength of Schedule7.5

-5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

68.3Tempo69.8

52.0%Effective FG%53.1%

17.7%Turnover Rate14.5%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

40.2%Free Throw Rate43.8%

0.5Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–47.2), offensive efficiency (118.8–107.5), net efficiency (5.8–0.7), strength of schedule (7.5–-0.5).

UNC Asheville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.8–113.0).

Final

UNC Asheville

62—87

Auburn

Auburn by 25 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNC AshevilleTEAM STATAuburn

23-51FG34-64

45.0%FG%53.0%

7-173PT7-21

41.0%3PT%33.0%

9-18FT12-15

50.0%FT%80.0%

26Rebounds36

4Offensive Rebounds9

14Assists19

14Turnovers7

6Steals9

1Blocks5

9Fouls16

Player Box Score

UNC Asheville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Drew Pember	Forward	33	7-14	3-6	6-8	2	1	2	1	23
Nick McMullen	Forward	24	5-6	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	10
Davion Cunningham	G	15	3-5	1-1	1-2	4	1	0	0	8
Jamon Battle	Forward	30	2-5	1-2	1-4	5	1	1	0	6
Josh Banks	Guard	26	1-5	1-2	1-2	1	2	1	0	4
Toyaz Solomon	F	18	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Trent Stephney	Guard	7	1-2	1-1	0-2	0	1	0	0	3
Caleb Burgess	Guard	27	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	6	0	0	2
Fletcher Abee	Guard	11	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Evan Johnson	Guard	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Dean Gabrelcik	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Donaldson	G	20	6-8	0-2	3-4	0	2	0	0	15
Chad Baker-Mazara	G	20	3-6	3-3	2-2	7	1	0	1	11
Denver Jones	Guard	23	4-8	1-4	0-0	5	1	0	0	9
Chaney Johnson	Forward	20	3-5	0-1	2-2	4	2	0	1	8
Jaylin Williams	Forward	18	3-6	0-0	2-2	4	3	2	0	8
Aden Holloway	G	20	3-11	1-5	0-0	2	5	0	0	7
Johni Broome	Forward	19	2-3	0-1	2-3	6	3	1	1	6
Dylan Cardwell	Center	19	3-6	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	6
K.D. Johnson	Guard	16	2-4	1-2	1-2	3	2	4	0	6
Chris Moore	Forward	10	3-4	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	6
Lior Berman	Guard	9	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Addarin Scott	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Blake Muschalek	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Haston Alexander	Center	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Carter Sobera	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4

89.3Offensive Efficiency125.4

125.4Defensive Efficiency89.3

-36.0Net Efficiency36.0

52.0%Effective FG%58.6%

52.1%True Shooting %61.2%

20.1%Turnover Rate10.1%

35.3%Free Throw Rate23.4%

33.3%3-Point Rate32.8%

1.00Assist / Turnover2.71

Game Summary

Auburn won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.