
Furman
22-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.7%Furman
36.3%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -3.5
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -175

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFurman 76
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScoreTulane 73
Team Comparison
53.9MMH Power Index44.3
113.3Offensive Efficiency105.3
105.1Defensive Efficiency109.9
8.2Net Efficiency-4.6
-1.8Strength of Schedule2.7
4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
67.4Tempo68.7
55.4%Effective FG%49.6%
17.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
32.6%Free Throw Rate44.8%
5.5Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Furman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (105.1–109.9), net efficiency (8.2–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-1.8), ball security (15.6–17.7), free throw rate (44.8–32.6).