Long Island University

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.2%Long Island University

50.8%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLong Island University -0.1

PROJECTED TOTAL146.6

MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -103

Rutgers

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLong Island University 73

Projected Total146.6

Projected ScoreRutgers 73

Team Comparison

Long Island UniversityMetricRutgers

50.2MMH Power Index45.9

107.6Offensive Efficiency104.2

104.8Defensive Efficiency112.2

2.8Net Efficiency-8.0

-1.3Strength of Schedule3.9

4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6

68.5Tempo67.4

53.0%Effective FG%47.4%

18.9%Turnover Rate15.0%

33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

34.9%Free Throw Rate36.3%

1.9Average Margin-5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Long Island University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLong Island University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–45.9), offensive efficiency (107.6–104.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–112.2), net efficiency (2.8–-8.0).

Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–-1.3), ball security (15.0–18.9), free throw rate (36.3–34.9).

Final

Long Island University

61—83

Rutgers

Rutgers by 22 • 75.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Long Island UniversityTEAM STATRutgers

25-60FG33-67

42.0%FG%49.0%

6-203PT4-20

30.0%3PT%20.0%

5-8FT13-26

63.0%FT%50.0%

33Rebounds43

7Offensive Rebounds14

13Assists18

19Turnovers9

7Steals9

3Blocks8

20Fouls8

Player Box Score

Long Island University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tana Kopa	Guard	37	6-10	4-8	3-3	6	0	3	1	19
CJ Delancy	F	20	6-7	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	2	12
Eric Acker	G	39	4-14	0-4	1-3	10	8	0	0	9
Andre Washington	G	22	3-8	2-5	1-2	4	0	0	0	9
Tai Strickland	Guard	26	3-10	0-2	0-0	3	2	2	0	6
Nikola Djapa	C	20	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Terell Strickland	Guard	15	1-4	0-1	0-0	3	2	1	0	2
Jason Steele	Forward	5	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Ahmed Essahaty	G	16	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	30	12-15	0-1	1-2	11	0	0	3	25
Aundre Hyatt	Forward	32	5-9	2-5	0-0	12	3	0	2	12
Jamichael Davis	G	29	5-11	0-1	2-5	4	3	2	0	12
Derek Simpson	G	26	2-7	0-3	6-6	4	3	2	0	10
Mawot Mag	Forward	24	4-8	2-4	0-3	4	3	1	2	10
Gavin Griffiths	G	21	3-9	0-4	2-5	1	2	3	1	8
Antwone Woolfolk	F	11	2-2	0-0	1-3	3	0	0	0	5
Noah Fernandes	Guard	24	0-6	0-2	1-2	1	4	0	0	1
Oskar Palmquist	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.1Possessions75.1

81.2Offensive Efficiency110.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency81.2

-29.3Net Efficiency29.3

46.7%Effective FG%52.2%

47.8%True Shooting %52.3%

25.1%Turnover Rate12.1%

13.3%Free Throw Rate38.8%

33.3%3-Point Rate29.9%

0.68Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Rutgers won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 75.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.