
Southern
17-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.1%Southern
61.9%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -162

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouthern 76
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreTulane 79
Team Comparison
44.5MMH Power Index44.3
108.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
106.4Defensive Efficiency109.9
2.3Net Efficiency-4.6
-7.5Strength of Schedule2.7
2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
73.3Tempo68.7
51.3%Effective FG%49.6%
16.3%Turnover Rate15.6%
31.9%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
40.3%Free Throw Rate44.8%
1.7Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Southern HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouthern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.5–44.3), offensive efficiency (108.7–105.3), defensive efficiency (106.4–109.9), net efficiency (2.3–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-7.5), ball security (15.6–16.3), free throw rate (44.8–40.3).