
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.4%Rider
95.6%Monmouth
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMonmouth -20.8
PROJECTED TOTAL141.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMonmouth -2173

Monmouth
19-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 60
Projected Total141.4
Projected ScoreMonmouth 81
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index52.2
96.3Offensive Efficiency106.4
115.3Defensive Efficiency103.8
-19.0Net Efficiency2.6
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.4
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0
65.9Tempo68.3
43.4%Effective FG%49.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate16.6%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
31.5%Free Throw Rate33.6%
-12.6Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Monmouth HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMonmouth holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.8–115.3), net efficiency (2.6–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–31.4).