
Air Force
3-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.0%Air Force
97.0%UT Arlington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -24.9
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -3233

UT Arlington
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAir Force 57
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 82
Team Comparison
23MMH Power Index49.6
91.3Offensive Efficiency102.7
118.5Defensive Efficiency97.9
-27.2Net Efficiency4.8
6.2Strength of Schedule-0.8
-33.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9
67.4Tempo68.1
49.0%Effective FG%48.5%
21.9%Turnover Rate20.4%
21.4%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
35.9%Free Throw Rate43.7%
-18.3Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY97.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–23.0), offensive efficiency (102.7–91.3), defensive efficiency (97.9–118.5), net efficiency (4.8–-27.2).
Air Force COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.2–-0.8), shooting efficiency (49.0–48.5).