Chattanooga logo

Chattanooga

13-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.3%Chattanooga
52.7%Alabama A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL149.8
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -111
Alabama A&M logo

Alabama A&M

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreChattanooga 74
Projected Total149.8
Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 76

Team Comparison

45.9MMH Power Index42.3
112.7Offensive Efficiency105.9
110.5Defensive Efficiency106.6
2.2Net Efficiency-0.7
-4.4Strength of Schedule-6.8
-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
68.1Tempo68.0
55.1%Effective FG%49.7%
14.1%Turnover Rate16.8%
23.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
29.2%Free Throw Rate45.7%
1.4Average Margin-0.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Chattanooga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChattanooga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (112.7–105.9), net efficiency (2.2–-0.7), strength of schedule (-4.4–-6.8).
Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–110.5), recent form (3.3–-0.1), offensive rebounding (28.0–23.5).
Final
Chattanooga logo
Chattanooga
88—72
Alabama A&M logo
Alabama A&M
Chattanooga by 16 • 71.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATAlabama A&M
29-54FG28-58
54.0%FG%48.0%
10-263PT4-19
38.0%3PT%21.0%
20-28FT12-21
71.0%FT%57.0%
38Rebounds31
10Offensive Rebounds10
16Assists13
13Turnovers15
9Steals5
1Blocks4
21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Chattanooga
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Honor HuffG347-156-114-524200024
Myles CheG305-71-35-625200016
Trey BonhamGuard184-72-44-612000014
Tyler MillinForward254-50-15-651000013
Sam AlexisF274-90-20-111221008
Randy BradyF211-21-22-27130005
Demetrius DavisForward152-50-20-14100004
Jan ZidekForward221-30-10-12000002
Noah MelsonG81-10-00-00000002
Alabama A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dailin SmithG276-100-27-920000019
Cameron TuckerGuard263-40-04-635000010
AC BryantG85-50-00-110000010
Jayland RandallG143-51-20-14112007
London RileyGuard172-42-40-00000006
Omari PeekGuard252-71-30-05110005
Eric LeeGuard132-20-00-11000004
Dylan McleanGuard112-60-20-01000004
Chad MoodieF131-30-01-23001003
Darius OsborneForward171-10-00-13210002
Caleb BlackwellG121-50-20-00410002
Lorenzo DowneyGuard90-40-40-02010000
William TavaresCenter80-20-00-02001000

Advanced Game Stats

71.7Possessions71.7
122.7Offensive Efficiency100.4
100.4Defensive Efficiency122.7
22.3Net Efficiency-22.3
63.0%Effective FG%51.7%
65.4%True Shooting %53.0%
18.5%Turnover Rate20.6%
51.9%Free Throw Rate36.2%
48.1%3-Point Rate32.8%
1.23Assist / Turnover0.87
Game Summary
Chattanooga won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 71.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.