Niagara

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.7%Niagara

53.3%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL135.1

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -114

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNiagara 67

Projected Total135.1

Projected ScoreBinghamton 69

Team Comparison

NiagaraMetricBinghamton

35.8MMH Power Index32.4

100.8Offensive Efficiency102.2

112.4Defensive Efficiency112.3

-11.6Net Efficiency-10.1

-0.8Strength of Schedule-6.0

-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

63.4Tempo64.2

50.9%Effective FG%51.3%

18.8%Turnover Rate18.5%

24.9%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

27.3%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-7.4Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–100.8), defensive efficiency (112.3–112.4), net efficiency (-10.1–-11.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.9).

Niagara COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (35.8–32.4), strength of schedule (-0.8–-6.0), recent form (-5.6–-6.2).

Final

Niagara

69—74

Binghamton

Binghamton by 5 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NiagaraTEAM STATBinghamton

25-67FG27-63

37.0%FG%43.0%

10-253PT2-8

40.0%3PT%25.0%

9-13FT18-27

69.0%FT%67.0%

38Rebounds46

11Offensive Rebounds14

12Assists10

7Turnovers9

3Steals3

6Blocks7

21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Niagara

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ahmad Henderson II	G	29	8-17	4-8	3-4	7	3	0	0	23
Luke Bumbalough	Guard	33	6-16	3-10	1-1	0	3	2	2	16
Braxton Bayless	G	21	4-9	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	9
Randy Tucker	Guard	20	3-4	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	7
Yaw Obeng-Mensah	Forward	30	2-4	0-0	2-4	8	2	0	1	6
Dre Bullock	G	22	0-5	0-2	3-4	4	0	1	2	3
Aime Rutayisire	Forward	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	2	0	1	3
Harlan Obioha	C	18	1-8	0-0	0-0	7	2	0	0	2
Kwane Marble	Guard	11	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tariq Balogun	Forward	30	7-10	0-0	7-8	7	0	0	2	21
Armon Harried	Guard	35	7-15	0-0	4-8	11	2	0	2	18
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	18	4-5	1-1	3-3	5	0	0	0	12
Symir Torrence	Guard	40	5-13	0-1	1-3	9	7	0	0	11
Dan Petcash	Guard	32	3-7	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	7
Tymu Chenery	Guard	29	1-8	0-3	3-5	6	1	1	3	5
Chris Walker	G	12	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	0	0
Gavin Walsh	F	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0

98.6Offensive Efficiency105.7

105.7Defensive Efficiency98.6

-7.1Net Efficiency7.1

44.8%Effective FG%44.4%

47.1%True Shooting %48.8%

10.1%Turnover Rate12.7%

19.4%Free Throw Rate42.9%

37.3%3-Point Rate12.7%

1.71Assist / Turnover1.11

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.