
Gardner-Webb
4-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.5%Gardner-Webb
93.5%Chattanooga
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADChattanooga -19.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.6
MODEL MONEYLINEChattanooga -1438

Chattanooga
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 68
Projected Total155.6
Projected ScoreChattanooga 88
Team Comparison
26.6MMH Power Index45.9
96.0Offensive Efficiency112.7
120.4Defensive Efficiency110.5
-24.4Net Efficiency2.2
3.3Strength of Schedule-4.4
-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1
71.0Tempo68.1
48.8%Effective FG%55.1%
19.2%Turnover Rate14.1%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %23.5%
31.5%Free Throw Rate29.2%
-17.3Average Margin1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Chattanooga HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChattanooga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–26.6), offensive efficiency (112.7–96.0), defensive efficiency (110.5–120.4), net efficiency (2.2–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-4.4), offensive rebounding (23.6–23.5), free throw rate (31.5–29.2).