
Cornell
15-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Cornell
56.3%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL156.4
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -129

Siena
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCornell 77
Projected Total156.4
Projected ScoreSiena 80
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index53.8
121.5Offensive Efficiency109.2
114.6Defensive Efficiency102.2
6.9Net Efficiency7.0
-1.1Strength of Schedule-0.5
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
72.8Tempo64.4
60.1%Effective FG%50.7%
16.0%Turnover Rate15.8%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
29.7%Free Throw Rate34.9%
5.1Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (102.2–114.6), net efficiency (7.0–6.9), strength of schedule (-0.5–-1.1), ball security (15.8–16.0).
Cornell COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (56.1–53.8), offensive efficiency (121.5–109.2), recent form (7.6–3.0).