
Sam Houston
22-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.5%Sam Houston
71.5%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -6.3
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -251

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSam Houston 73
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 80
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index59.8
115.5Offensive Efficiency109.2
105.5Defensive Efficiency99.1
10.0Net Efficiency10.1
-2.2Strength of Schedule2.0
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
71.2Tempo69.3
53.2%Effective FG%52.1%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.6%
37.4%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
34.8%Free Throw Rate41.0%
7.1Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–56.1), defensive efficiency (99.1–105.5), net efficiency (10.1–10.0), strength of schedule (2.0–-2.2).
Sam Houston COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–109.2), shooting efficiency (53.2–52.1), ball security (16.6–17.6).