
Bethune-Cookman
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.7%Bethune-Cookman
40.3%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL148.5
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -148

Chicago State
7-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 75
Projected Total148.5
Projected ScoreChicago State 73
Team Comparison
44.2MMH Power Index36.1
104.7Offensive Efficiency99.4
106.9Defensive Efficiency114.9
-2.2Net Efficiency-15.5
-3.3Strength of Schedule0.5
4.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
72.0Tempo66.2
51.9%Effective FG%45.6%
19.2%Turnover Rate15.8%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
41.9%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-1.6Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–36.1), offensive efficiency (104.7–99.4), defensive efficiency (106.9–114.9), net efficiency (-2.2–-15.5).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-3.3), ball security (15.8–19.2).