Holy Cross logo

Holy Cross

11-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.5%Holy Cross
89.5%Harvard
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -14.8
PROJECTED TOTAL138.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -852
Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHoly Cross 62
Projected Total138.5
Projected ScoreHarvard 77

Team Comparison

37.9MMH Power Index52.6
103.3Offensive Efficiency108.1
110.9Defensive Efficiency102.9
-7.6Net Efficiency5.2
-2.6Strength of Schedule-0.1
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3
66.1Tempo64.8
49.8%Effective FG%53.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.2%
22.4%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
32.5%Free Throw Rate27.9%
-5.1Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–37.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–103.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.9), net efficiency (5.2–-7.6).
Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHball security (15.4–17.2), free throw rate (32.5–27.9).
Final
Holy Cross logo
Holy Cross
72—74
Harvard logo
Harvard
Harvard by 2 • 64.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Holy CrossTEAM STATHarvard
29-58FG26-53
50.0%FG%49.0%
9-233PT11-24
39.0%3PT%46.0%
5-6FT11-14
83.0%FT%79.0%
24Rebounds32
4Offensive Rebounds7
8Assists15
8Turnovers11
4Steals2
3Blocks2
16Fouls8

Player Box Score

Holy Cross
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Joe OctaveGuard3610-215-110-082100025
Kahlil SingletonG378-133-62-220100021
Caleb KenneyForward245-80-01-172130011
A.J. WillsG314-111-41-103100010
Declan RyanF262-30-01-22000005
Joe NugentF250-10-10-01000000
DeAndre WilliamsG150-10-10-01100000
Louth-M CoulibalyForward60-00-00-02000000
Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chisom OkparaF3410-141-25-664000026
Tyler SimonF174-84-70-051010012
Louis LesmondG293-53-40-03010009
Chandler PiggeG283-101-42-22300009
Thomas Batties IIF262-51-31-24100006
Luca Ace-NasteskiF202-30-01-22000005
Denham WojcikG371-40-12-26510004
Xavier NesbittG91-41-30-01101003

Advanced Game Stats

64.3Possessions64.3
112.0Offensive Efficiency115.1
115.1Defensive Efficiency112.0
-3.1Net Efficiency3.1
57.8%Effective FG%59.4%
59.2%True Shooting %62.0%
12.3%Turnover Rate17.3%
10.3%Free Throw Rate26.4%
39.7%3-Point Rate45.3%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.36
Game Summary
Harvard won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 64.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.