
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.6%Colgate
57.4%Iona
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIona -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINEIona -135

Iona
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 74
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScoreIona 77
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index46.9
111.7Offensive Efficiency105.8
109.0Defensive Efficiency104.8
2.7Net Efficiency1.0
-2.0Strength of Schedule-1.6
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
68.4Tempo69.8
54.5%Effective FG%51.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.2%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %27.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate29.9%
1.8Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–46.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–105.8), net efficiency (2.7–1.0), shooting efficiency (54.5–51.9).
Iona COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–109.0), strength of schedule (-1.6–-2.0), recent form (1.5–-0.3).