William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

77.4%William & Mary

22.6%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL159.9

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -342

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 84

Projected Total159.9

Projected ScorePepperdine 76

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricPepperdine

53.8MMH Power Index38.2

112.5Offensive Efficiency103.2

105.2Defensive Efficiency113.6

7.3Net Efficiency-10.4

-1.5Strength of Schedule0.7

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

73.9Tempo70.0

55.3%Effective FG%48.7%

16.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

45.3%Free Throw Rate34.0%

5.4Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–38.2), offensive efficiency (112.5–103.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–113.6), net efficiency (7.3–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (31.1–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

59—71

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 12 • 64.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATPepperdine

18-45FG27-66

40.0%FG%41.0%

6-183PT5-20

33.0%3PT%25.0%

17-22FT12-21

77.0%FT%57.0%

22Rebounds53

—Offensive Rebounds22

8Assists10

9Turnovers10

3Steals2

2Blocks4

19Fouls15

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Moss	G	40	5-9	2-3	3-3	2	2	1	0	15
Matteus Case	Guard	28	5-7	3-4	2-2	4	1	1	0	15
Chase Lowe	G	31	2-7	0-0	5-8	3	2	0	0	9
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	37	2-7	1-3	3-4	6	1	0	0	8
Charlie Williams	C	14	3-6	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	1	7
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	37	1-9	0-8	3-3	4	1	1	0	5
Miles Hicks	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Nick Evans	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Ajayi	F	29	7-15	1-2	1-4	12	1	0	0	16
Boubacar Coulibaly	Forward	26	6-13	0-0	1-2	13	0	0	3	13
Malik Messina-Moore	G	25	6-12	1-5	0-0	3	0	0	0	13
Houston Mallette	G	32	3-9	1-4	0-0	4	1	0	0	7
Jevon Porter	F	16	1-6	0-3	5-6	5	2	0	1	7
Cord Stansberry	G	7	2-3	2-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	6
Nils Cooper	G	23	0-2	0-2	3-4	8	1	0	0	3
Ethan Anderson	Guard	24	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	3	0	0	2
Paul Jordan	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	2-4	1	0	0	0	2
David Mager	G	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Jalen Pitre	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	2	0	0
Curtis Williams	Guard	4	0-1	0-1	0-1	0	0	0	0	0
John Squire	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.3Possessions64.3

91.8Offensive Efficiency110.4

110.4Defensive Efficiency91.8

-18.7Net Efficiency18.7

46.7%Effective FG%44.7%

53.2%True Shooting %46.7%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

48.9%Free Throw Rate31.8%

40.0%3-Point Rate30.3%

0.89Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 64.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.