Wyoming logo

Wyoming

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Wyoming
31.1%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWyoming -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL146.8
MODEL MONEYLINEWyoming -222
UTEP logo

UTEP

11-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWyoming 76
Projected Total146.8
Projected ScoreUTEP 71

Team Comparison

56.1MMH Power Index44.4
113.4Offensive Efficiency102.6
107.7Defensive Efficiency107.1
5.7Net Efficiency-4.5
2.2Strength of Schedule1.7
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
67.8Tempo67.6
52.2%Effective FG%49.2%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.3%
34.6%Offensive Rebound %27.6%
36.7%Free Throw Rate35.6%
3.9Average Margin-3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wyoming HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (113.4–102.6), net efficiency (5.7–-4.5), strength of schedule (2.2–1.7).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.1–107.7).
Final
Wyoming logo
Wyoming
67—78
UTEP logo
UTEP
UTEP by 11 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WyomingTEAM STATUTEP
17-50FG24-50
34.0%FG%48.0%
5-223PT4-13
23.0%3PT%31.0%
28-32FT26-35
88.0%FT%74.0%
35Rebounds30
14Offensive Rebounds8
9Assists7
16Turnovers12
4Steals7
1Blocks3
24Fouls28

Player Box Score

Wyoming
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Mason WaltersForward285-80-16-630200016
Akuel KotGuard384-122-64-423000014
Sam GriffinGuard362-112-65-642100011
Brendan WenzelGuard342-100-67-852000011
Caden PowellC241-20-06-811001008
Cam ManyawuF122-30-00-03100004
Kobe NewtonGuard261-31-30-04110003
Oleg KojenetsF20-10-00-03000000
UTEP
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zid PowellGuard349-170-114-1864110032
Otis Frazier IIIForward275-83-52-230000015
Tae HardyGuard385-111-23-662100014
Corey Camper Jr.G311-40-22-21021004
Baylor HebbGuard120-20-24-61110004
Jonathan Dos AnjosForward112-30-10-04000004
Calvin SolomonForward131-10-01-11000003
Kevin KaluForward231-30-00-05011002
Elijah JonesF60-10-00-00000000
David Terrell Jr.G50-00-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9
97.2Offensive Efficiency113.2
113.2Defensive Efficiency97.2
-16.0Net Efficiency16.0
39.0%Effective FG%52.0%
51.4%True Shooting %58.5%
23.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
64.0%Free Throw Rate70.0%
44.0%3-Point Rate26.0%
0.56Assist / Turnover0.58
Game Summary
UTEP won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.