
Wyoming
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Wyoming
31.1%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWyoming -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL146.8
MODEL MONEYLINEWyoming -222

UTEP
11-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWyoming 76
Projected Total146.8
Projected ScoreUTEP 71
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index44.4
113.4Offensive Efficiency102.6
107.7Defensive Efficiency107.1
5.7Net Efficiency-4.5
2.2Strength of Schedule1.7
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
67.8Tempo67.6
52.2%Effective FG%49.2%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.3%
34.6%Offensive Rebound %27.6%
36.7%Free Throw Rate35.6%
3.9Average Margin-3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wyoming HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (113.4–102.6), net efficiency (5.7–-4.5), strength of schedule (2.2–1.7).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.1–107.7).