
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.4%Hofstra
44.6%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL151.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -124

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Projected Total151.8
Projected ScoreUNLV 75
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index52.8
114.0Offensive Efficiency111.0
100.9Defensive Efficiency109.6
13.1Net Efficiency1.4
-2.9Strength of Schedule2.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
66.2Tempo71.4
52.2%Effective FG%53.7%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.2%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
32.0%Free Throw Rate41.6%
8.7Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–52.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–111.0), defensive efficiency (100.9–109.6), net efficiency (13.1–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.9), shooting efficiency (53.7–52.2), free throw rate (41.6–32.0).