
Bucknell
10-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.5%Bucknell
92.5%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -16.9
PROJECTED TOTAL138.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -1233

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 61
Projected Total138.7
Projected ScoreMerrimack 78
Team Comparison
35.7MMH Power Index53.7
99.5Offensive Efficiency106.4
112.8Defensive Efficiency103.2
-13.3Net Efficiency3.2
2.0Strength of Schedule0.7
-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
67.7Tempo64.4
48.4%Effective FG%49.3%
19.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
30.7%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-8.9Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–35.7), offensive efficiency (106.4–99.5), defensive efficiency (103.2–112.8), net efficiency (3.2–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–0.7), offensive rebounding (26.6–24.7).