Drake

14-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.7%Drake

84.3%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -11.5

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -537

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDrake 71

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreUAB 83

Team Comparison

DrakeMetricUAB

46.4MMH Power Index56.9

109.5Offensive Efficiency110.5

109.1Defensive Efficiency102.9

0.4Net Efficiency7.6

0.3Strength of Schedule0.4

-11.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

68.6Tempo71.7

52.2%Effective FG%48.8%

14.9%Turnover Rate12.4%

27.2%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

34.4%Free Throw Rate36.9%

0.2Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–46.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.5), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.1), net efficiency (7.6–0.4).

Drake COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.2–48.8).

Final

Drake

78—79

UAB

UAB by 1 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DrakeTEAM STATUAB

30-63FG27-53

48.0%FG%51.0%

6-193PT8-20

32.0%3PT%40.0%

12-12FT17-26

100.0%FT%65.0%

34Rebounds28

15Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists14

14Turnovers11

5Steals9

—Blocks5

19Fouls13

Player Box Score

Drake

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Atin Wright	Guard	40	6-11	2-3	6-6	3	2	2	20
Tucker DeVries	F	41	8-19	3-11	0-0	4	5	0	19
Darnell Brodie	Forward	35	5-10	0-0	2-2	15	5	0	12
Colby Garland	G	38	4-8	0-3	2-2	2	3	1	10
Kevin Overton	G	36	4-8	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	9
Nate Ferguson	Forward	10	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	4
Carlos Rosario	Forward	13	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2
Kyron Gibson	Guard	12	0-2	0-0	2-2	1	0	1	2

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Javian Davis	Forward	41	4-9	0-0	7-8	2	0	4	0	15
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	32	5-7	1-2	2-4	8	3	0	1	13
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	18	4-5	3-4	0-0	3	0	1	1	11
Butta Johnson	G	36	4-8	2-4	0-2	2	1	0	0	10
Tony Toney	Guard	29	3-5	2-3	2-2	2	1	2	1	10
Eric Gaines	Guard	37	3-13	0-5	3-4	7	9	2	1	9
Christian Coleman	G	17	4-4	0-0	0-2	3	0	0	1	8
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	15	0-2	0-2	3-4	1	0	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

117.1Offensive Efficiency118.6

118.6Defensive Efficiency117.1

-1.5Net Efficiency1.5

52.4%Effective FG%58.5%

56.8%True Shooting %60.4%

20.7%Turnover Rate16.8%

19.0%Free Throw Rate49.1%

30.2%3-Point Rate37.7%

1.07Assist / Turnover1.27

Game Summary

UAB won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.