
Stetson
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.2%Stetson
94.8%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -20.0
PROJECTED TOTAL148.2
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -1823

Cincinnati
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 64
Projected Total148.2
Projected ScoreCincinnati 84
Team Comparison
40MMH Power Index61.5
107.2Offensive Efficiency105.3
115.9Defensive Efficiency97.3
-8.7Net Efficiency8.0
-1.0Strength of Schedule5.1
-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
68.7Tempo69.4
53.8%Effective FG%50.6%
18.3%Turnover Rate17.0%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
33.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-6.0Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–40.0), defensive efficiency (97.3–115.9), net efficiency (8.0–-8.7), strength of schedule (5.1–-1.0).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.2–105.3), shooting efficiency (53.8–50.6), free throw rate (33.6–30.7).