Canisius

10-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.2%Canisius

98.8%High Point

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -30.5

PROJECTED TOTAL148.0

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -8233

High Point

31-5

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCanisius 59

Projected Total148.0

Projected ScoreHigh Point 89

Team Comparison

CanisiusMetricHigh Point

33.9MMH Power Index69

97.1Offensive Efficiency123.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency98.3

-11.7Net Efficiency25.5

-1.8Strength of Schedule-5.8

-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5

64.8Tempo72.4

46.8%Effective FG%56.6%

19.6%Turnover Rate12.8%

29.1%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

32.4%Free Throw Rate42.4%

-7.5Average Margin18.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–33.9), offensive efficiency (123.8–97.1), defensive efficiency (98.3–108.8), net efficiency (25.5–-11.7).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-5.8).

Final

Canisius

70—78

High Point

High Point by 8 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CanisiusTEAM STATHigh Point

27-59FG28-58

46.0%FG%48.0%

10-213PT7-19

48.0%3PT%37.0%

6-8FT15-20

75.0%FT%75.0%

26Rebounds40

8Offensive Rebounds15

15Assists14

11Turnovers16

8Steals7

2Blocks3

21Fouls11

Player Box Score

Canisius

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Dinkins	G	40	9-19	5-11	2-2	1	4	1	0	25
Frank Mitchell	F	21	6-8	2-2	0-0	7	4	1	0	14
Siem Uijtendaal	Guard	34	3-9	2-3	4-6	1	3	3	2	12
TJ Gadsden	Guard	30	4-11	1-4	0-0	4	1	1	0	9
Cameron Palesse	G	11	2-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Youri Fritz	F	29	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	2	2	0	2
Bryce Okpoh	Forward	20	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Devean Williams	G	9	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
TJ Porter	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	34	5-10	2-4	5-6	4	4	1	0	17
Kimani Hamilton	F	34	4-8	0-2	6-7	8	2	2	1	14
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	26	5-9	0-0	2-2	3	1	1	0	12
Trae Benham	Guard	30	4-12	3-8	0-0	3	2	1	0	11
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	28	5-8	0-0	0-1	10	1	1	2	10
Kezza Giffa	G	24	3-8	1-3	2-4	5	3	1	0	9
Cade Potter	Forward	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Titas Sargiunas	F	9	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Pavlo Dziuba	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

104.2Offensive Efficiency116.1

116.1Defensive Efficiency104.2

-11.9Net Efficiency11.9

54.2%Effective FG%54.3%

55.7%True Shooting %57.8%

16.7%Turnover Rate23.4%

13.6%Free Throw Rate34.5%

35.6%3-Point Rate32.8%

1.36Assist / Turnover0.88

Game Summary

High Point won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.