Marist

19-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

41.0%Marist

59.0%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL142.1

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -144

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMarist 70

Projected Total142.1

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 72

Team Comparison

MaristMetricNotre Dame

51MMH Power Index49.7

104.3Offensive Efficiency110.3

95.6Defensive Efficiency111.2

8.7Net Efficiency-0.9

-3.2Strength of Schedule4.7

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

66.8Tempo68.0

49.9%Effective FG%53.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%

29.4%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

26.1%Free Throw Rate34.7%

5.8Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Marist HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarist holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–49.7), defensive efficiency (95.6–111.2), net efficiency (8.7–-0.9), recent form (2.9–-11.6).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–104.3), strength of schedule (4.7–-3.2), shooting efficiency (53.0–49.9).

Final

Marist

56—60

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 4 • 57.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MaristTEAM STATNotre Dame

22-50FG18-44

44.0%FG%41.0%

5-153PT6-16

33.0%3PT%38.0%

7-13FT18-20

54.0%FT%90.0%

25Rebounds32

9Offensive Rebounds11

7Assists8

11Turnovers15

10Steals6

4Blocks4

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

Marist

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Allen II	Center	18	6-9	1-1	1-2	1	0	1	1	14
Jadin Collins	Guard	32	6-10	0-1	0-1	4	5	3	0	12
Noah Harris	Guard	20	3-6	3-4	0-0	0	1	3	0	9
Jaden Daughtry	F	29	2-4	0-1	4-4	7	0	1	1	8
Josh Pascarelli	G	33	2-7	0-3	1-4	3	0	0	0	5
Javon Cooley	G	17	1-3	1-2	0-0	3	0	1	1	3
Jackson Price	Forward	22	1-6	0-3	0-0	3	1	1	0	2
Trace Salton	F	11	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Isaiah Brickner	G	18	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	1	1

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	33	8-18	2-6	3-4	3	3	4	0	21
Tae Davis	F	33	3-7	0-2	6-6	3	2	0	0	12
Carey Booth	F	30	3-6	2-3	3-4	6	1	0	1	11
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	23	1-4	0-2	4-4	4	0	0	0	6
J.R. Konieczny	F	31	1-3	1-1	2-2	5	1	0	0	5
Matt Zona	Forward	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	1	3
Kebba Njie	F	20	1-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	2	2
Logan Imes	G	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.9Possessions57.9

96.7Offensive Efficiency103.6

103.6Defensive Efficiency96.7

-6.9Net Efficiency6.9

49.0%Effective FG%47.7%

49.8%True Shooting %56.1%

18.9%Turnover Rate26.1%

26.0%Free Throw Rate45.5%

30.0%3-Point Rate36.4%

0.64Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 57.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.