Houston Christian logo

Houston Christian

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.1%Houston Christian
92.9%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -17.5
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -1308
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHouston Christian 65
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 83

Team Comparison

39.5MMH Power Index58
102.5Offensive Efficiency116.1
110.3Defensive Efficiency108.4
-7.8Net Efficiency7.7
-0.6Strength of Schedule4.8
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
65.4Tempo69.1
49.9%Effective FG%53.5%
19.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
37.1%Free Throw Rate37.5%
-5.1Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–39.5), offensive efficiency (116.1–102.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–110.3), net efficiency (7.7–-7.8).
Final
Houston Christian logo
Houston Christian
52—79
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 27 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Houston ChristianTEAM STATTexas A&M
17-51FG22-64
33.0%FG%34.0%
6-233PT7-27
26.0%3PT%26.0%
12-19FT28-38
63.0%FT%74.0%
35Rebounds49
9Offensive Rebounds22
9Assists15
18Turnovers7
3Steals8
3Blocks3
24Fouls16

Player Box Score

Houston Christian
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Marcus GreeneG376-133-83-634200018
Tristan MooreForward264-123-63-320000014
Pierce BazilPG322-90-51-33400005
Nate HudsonForward141-20-03-41010005
Michael ImariagbeF222-40-00-06002004
Porter BazilSF172-50-10-04001004
Bonke MaringCenter200-20-02-26100002
Dominic CapriottiG180-20-20-04000000
Chigozie AcharaForward120-10-00-12000000
Nathan SelfGuard20-10-10-00000000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hayden HefnerGuard257-143-87-820000024
Jace CarterNot Available273-101-63-4121100010
Wade Taylor IVGuard222-82-64-412000010
Andersson GarciaForward353-81-12-419412009
Henry Coleman IIIForward263-60-02-45120008
Eli LawrenceGuard102-40-22-51020006
Solomon WashingtonF261-40-22-25501004
Manny ObasekiGuard191-70-02-22020004
Jaelyn LeeG20-00-04-51000004
Bryce LindsayG80-30-20-00200000

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1
76.4Offensive Efficiency116.0
116.0Defensive Efficiency76.4
-39.6Net Efficiency39.6
39.2%Effective FG%39.8%
43.3%True Shooting %48.1%
26.1%Turnover Rate10.4%
37.3%Free Throw Rate59.4%
45.1%3-Point Rate42.2%
0.50Assist / Turnover2.14
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.