
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
89.5%Pennsylvania
10.5%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL145.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -852

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 79
Projected Total145.6
Projected ScoreRider 66
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index29.1
108.6Offensive Efficiency96.3
106.4Defensive Efficiency115.3
2.2Net Efficiency-19.0
1.9Strength of Schedule-0.9
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
69.9Tempo65.9
50.9%Effective FG%43.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.1%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
36.3%Free Throw Rate31.5%
1.5Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (108.6–96.3), defensive efficiency (106.4–115.3), net efficiency (2.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–31.1).