
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.1%Rider
87.9%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPenn State -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL147.3
MODEL MONEYLINEPenn State -726

Penn State
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 67
Projected Total147.3
Projected ScorePenn State 80
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index42.3
96.3Offensive Efficiency109.2
115.3Defensive Efficiency117.6
-19.0Net Efficiency-8.4
-0.9Strength of Schedule5.3
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
65.9Tempo67.5
43.4%Effective FG%53.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
31.5%Free Throw Rate34.6%
-12.6Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Penn State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPenn State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–29.1), offensive efficiency (109.2–96.3), net efficiency (-8.4–-19.0), strength of schedule (5.3–-0.9).
Rider COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.3–117.6), recent form (-17.7–-20.8), offensive rebounding (32.8–25.6).