Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.8%Stonehill

80.2%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRutgers -7.7

PROJECTED TOTAL140.1

MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -405

Rutgers

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 66

Projected Total140.1

Projected ScoreRutgers 74

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricRutgers

37.9MMH Power Index45.9

97.5Offensive Efficiency104.2

100.7Defensive Efficiency112.2

-3.2Net Efficiency-8.0

-5.4Strength of Schedule3.9

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6

68.1Tempo67.4

48.0%Effective FG%47.4%

19.1%Turnover Rate15.0%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

29.2%Free Throw Rate36.3%

-2.2Average Margin-5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rutgers HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRutgers holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–37.9), offensive efficiency (104.2–97.5), strength of schedule (3.9–-5.4), recent form (-1.6–-3.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–112.2), net efficiency (-3.2–-8.0), shooting efficiency (48.0–47.4).

Final

Stonehill

58—59

Rutgers

Rutgers by 1 • 69.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATRutgers

19-60FG16-62

32.0%FG%26.0%

8-293PT5-28

28.0%3PT%18.0%

12-14FT22-35

86.0%FT%63.0%

46Rebounds48

14Offensive Rebounds20

12Assists12

17Turnovers11

8Steals9

2Blocks4

26Fouls13

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chas Stinson	G	37	8-11	2-3	5-5	12	2	1	1	23
Tony Felder	Guard	35	3-20	1-9	6-7	2	2	3	0	13
Todd Brogna	F	34	4-8	4-6	0-0	8	2	0	0	12
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	18	2-5	0-2	1-2	4	1	1	0	5
Louie Semona III	F	31	1-7	1-6	0-0	5	2	0	0	3
Neal Marquardt	Forward	19	1-2	0-0	0-0	5	1	2	0	2
Nathan McGill	Guard	12	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	1	0
Thatcher Stone	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Austin Abrams	Guard	5	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	33	3-6	0-0	11-20	17	1	2	3	17
Aundre Hyatt	Forward	28	5-14	3-10	2-2	4	0	0	0	15
Derek Simpson	G	36	4-15	1-4	5-5	6	4	2	0	14
Austin Williams	Guard	12	2-3	1-2	1-4	3	0	0	1	6
Mawot Mag	Forward	22	1-7	0-2	3-4	3	2	1	0	5
Oskar Palmquist	Forward	10	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Noah Fernandes	Guard	29	0-4	0-2	0-0	1	4	3	0	0
Gavin Griffiths	G	17	0-5	0-3	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Antwone Woolfolk	F	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Antonio Chol	F	6	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.7Possessions69.7

83.2Offensive Efficiency84.6

84.6Defensive Efficiency83.2

-1.4Net Efficiency1.4

38.3%Effective FG%29.8%

43.5%True Shooting %37.5%

24.4%Turnover Rate15.8%

23.3%Free Throw Rate56.5%

48.3%3-Point Rate45.2%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Rutgers won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.