
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Columbia
58.2%Fordham
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL141.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -139

Fordham
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 69
Projected Total141.7
Projected ScoreFordham 72
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index50.3
112.4Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.2Defensive Efficiency99.3
7.2Net Efficiency6.6
-1.7Strength of Schedule-2.4
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9
68.2Tempo65.9
54.4%Effective FG%50.0%
19.1%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
28.8%Free Throw Rate26.9%
5.0Average Margin4.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–50.3), offensive efficiency (112.4–105.9), net efficiency (7.2–6.6), strength of schedule (-1.7–-2.4).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.3–105.2), recent form (-0.9–-2.4), ball security (17.3–19.1).