
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.5%Longwood
87.5%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -12.0
PROJECTED TOTAL149.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -700

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 69
Projected Total149.0
Projected ScoreDayton 80
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index59.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency108.5
103.0Defensive Efficiency101.5
5.1Net Efficiency7.0
-6.4Strength of Schedule5.7
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
71.9Tempo68.3
51.4%Effective FG%52.0%
19.3%Turnover Rate16.9%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
42.0%Free Throw Rate47.6%
3.6Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–47.0), offensive efficiency (108.5–108.1), defensive efficiency (101.5–103.0), net efficiency (7.0–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.4–26.7).