UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.3%UCLA
25.7%Oregon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -289
Oregon logo

Oregon

12-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 77
Projected Total147.6
Projected ScoreOregon 71

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index48.9
115.9Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.9Defensive Efficiency110.7
9.0Net Efficiency-4.3
5.1Strength of Schedule6.0
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
66.5Tempo66.7
53.5%Effective FG%49.9%
13.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %31.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.0Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–48.9), offensive efficiency (115.9–106.4), defensive efficiency (106.9–110.7), net efficiency (9.0–-4.3).
Oregon COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.0–5.1), offensive rebounding (31.6–30.7), free throw rate (36.9–33.8).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
59—64
Oregon logo
Oregon
Oregon by 5 • 63.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATOregon
24-56FG22-54
43.0%FG%41.0%
3-193PT10-25
16.0%3PT%40.0%
8-11FT10-14
73.0%FT%71.0%
34Rebounds30
13Offensive Rebounds10
14Assists10
16Turnovers11
7Steals12
5Blocks4
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Adem BonaCenter356-70-03-5110150015
Berke BuyuktuncelC215-71-21-230000012
Lazar StefanovicGuard384-140-62-283300010
Dylan AndrewsG382-121-72-22610007
Sebastian MackG243-80-20-03210006
Brandon WilliamsF213-40-00-03210006
Will McClendonG201-41-20-02100003
Kenneth NwubaForward30-00-00-00000000
Oregon
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jackson ShelstadG367-134-72-223100020
Jermaine CouisnardGuard336-113-60-021300015
Jadrian TraceyG313-72-32-234200010
Brennan Rigsby Jr.G152-61-43-41010008
Kwame Evans Jr.F252-50-32-28013006
Kario OquendoGuard272-70-21-44010005
Mahamadou DiawaraForward180-30-00-03001000
Keeshawn BarthelemyGuard150-20-00-02230000

Advanced Game Stats

63.0Possessions63.0
93.7Offensive Efficiency101.6
101.6Defensive Efficiency93.7
-7.9Net Efficiency7.9
45.5%Effective FG%50.0%
48.2%True Shooting %52.8%
24.9%Turnover Rate17.8%
19.6%Free Throw Rate25.9%
33.9%3-Point Rate46.3%
0.88Assist / Turnover0.91
Game Summary
Oregon won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.