Dartmouth

11-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

2.7%Dartmouth

97.3%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -23.2

PROJECTED TOTAL160.2

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -3604

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDartmouth 68

Projected Total160.2

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 92

Team Comparison

DartmouthMetricVanderbilt

41.3MMH Power Index68.9

108.2Offensive Efficiency120.9

109.5Defensive Efficiency105.7

-1.3Net Efficiency15.2

-2.2Strength of Schedule7.4

-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

70.1Tempo70.9

52.9%Effective FG%55.3%

17.4%Turnover Rate13.5%

25.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

38.4%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-0.9Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–41.3), offensive efficiency (120.9–108.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.5), net efficiency (15.2–-1.3).

Final

Dartmouth

53—69

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 16 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DartmouthTEAM STATVanderbilt

20-53FG26-62

38.0%FG%42.0%

5-223PT9-27

23.0%3PT%33.0%

8-8FT8-9

100.0%FT%89.0%

35Rebounds35

3Offensive Rebounds5

8Assists10

13Turnovers6

2Steals6

1Blocks1

12Fouls11

Player Box Score

Dartmouth

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dusan Neskovic	Forward	34	5-15	4-8	0-0	9	1	1	0	14
Brandon Mitchell-Day	F	28	5-11	0-1	4-4	9	0	0	0	14
Jaren Johnson	Guard	30	4-7	0-2	2-2	3	5	0	0	10
Jayden Williams	F	27	3-10	1-7	0-0	5	1	1	0	7
Jackson Munro	F	25	2-4	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	4
Connor Christensen	Forward	31	1-3	0-1	0-0	5	0	0	1	2
Ryan Cornish	G	11	0-2	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Romeo Myrthil	Not Available	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ezra Manjon	Guard	35	9-17	3-4	2-2	2	5	1	0	23
Tyrin Lawrence	Guard	35	7-16	2-4	6-7	8	3	2	0	22
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	29	2-5	2-5	0-0	6	0	0	1	6
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	25	3-11	0-5	0-0	3	1	3	0	6
Jordan Williams	G	21	2-3	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Evan Taylor	Guard	22	2-5	0-3	0-0	5	0	0	0	4
Paul Lewis	G	15	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Carter Lang	F	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Graham Calton	Guard	3	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Malik Presley	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

79.0Offensive Efficiency102.8

102.8Defensive Efficiency79.0

-23.8Net Efficiency23.8

42.5%Effective FG%49.2%

46.7%True Shooting %52.1%

19.5%Turnover Rate8.9%

15.1%Free Throw Rate14.5%

41.5%3-Point Rate43.5%

0.62Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.