Florida International

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.9%Florida International

54.1%Utah Tech

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Tech -2.0

PROJECTED TOTAL158.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Tech -118

Utah Tech

19-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida International 78

Projected Total158.4

Projected ScoreUtah Tech 80

Team Comparison

Florida InternationalMetricUtah Tech

50.4MMH Power Index47.3

109.6Offensive Efficiency108.8

105.9Defensive Efficiency106.1

3.7Net Efficiency2.7

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.3

-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.0

73.6Tempo70.6

51.6%Effective FG%54.4%

17.7%Turnover Rate17.5%

35.1%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

40.1%Free Throw Rate32.8%

2.8Average Margin1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida International HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida International holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.4–47.3), offensive efficiency (109.6–108.8), defensive efficiency (105.9–106.1), net efficiency (3.7–2.7).

Utah Tech COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.4–51.6), ball security (17.5–17.7).

Final

Florida International

92—96

Utah Tech

Utah Tech by 4 • 88.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida InternationalTEAM STATUtah Tech

33-74FG30-64

45.0%FG%47.0%

12-353PT14-26

34.0%3PT%54.0%

14-32FT22-36

44.0%FT%61.0%

34Rebounds58

10Offensive Rebounds18

16Assists18

9Turnovers25

15Steals1

1Blocks4

32Fouls27

Player Box Score

Florida International

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Javaunte Hawkins	Guard	35	10-20	5-12	2-4	3	4	3	0	27
Arturo Dean	G	30	8-17	1-4	4-7	5	3	6	0	21
Jaidon Lipscomb	G	34	5-11	3-8	0-1	5	3	5	0	13
Mohamed Sanogo	Forward	20	5-6	0-0	2-6	4	1	0	1	12
Jayden Brewer	G	17	1-4	0-0	2-7	2	1	0	0	4
Dashon Gittens	G	27	1-7	0-2	1-2	4	2	0	0	3
George Pridgett Jr.	Guard	13	1-4	1-4	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Dante Wilcox	Forward	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Petar Krivokapic	Guard	9	1-4	1-4	0-1	1	0	1	0	3
Jaden Grant	Guard	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Seth Pinkney	Center	22	0-0	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1

Utah Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	40	7-12	7-11	0-0	3	1	1	0	21
Aric Demings	Guard	30	4-7	1-1	10-16	7	3	0	0	19
Tanner Christensen	Center	34	6-9	0-1	3-4	10	5	0	4	15
Angelo Kambala	Guard	27	2-8	2-6	5-7	3	4	0	0	11
Jaylen Searles	G	25	4-8	3-3	0-1	5	2	0	0	11
Hamed Olayinka	F	16	4-5	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	8
Unisa Turay	Guard	17	2-6	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	5
Caleb Stearman	Forward	12	1-3	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	0	4
Beon Riley	Guard	12	0-2	0-0	1-2	8	0	0	0	1
Tennessee Rainwater	F	10	0-4	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	1
Stone Hutchings	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

88.2Possessions88.2

104.3Offensive Efficiency108.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency104.3

-4.5Net Efficiency4.5

52.7%Effective FG%57.8%

51.6%True Shooting %59.2%

10.2%Turnover Rate28.4%

43.2%Free Throw Rate56.3%

47.3%3-Point Rate40.6%

1.78Assist / Turnover0.72

Game Summary

Utah Tech won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 88.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.